PUBLICLY REQUEST PARDON TO DECEIVE MY PEOPLE

 Companions who have trusted me among them the grandmother and my mother the children in addition to other friends, trusted of the political conviction of my head and his great profits today no longer we are kidnapped in the city as it were in another hour when the terrorist fishing in highways prevented us to leave the ends week to puebliar, he and you understand that the best option to continue the policies of democratic security is choosing ex- minister Santos, you you will say and with respectable reason  So that nonVargas? If it has affinity in fighting the guerrillas specially, truth but lately this distant one of the directives of Alvaro Uribe by this does not have the endorsement sufficient to arrive, the risk is that we can lose all the way that we won with Uribe. I publicly request pardon to ingest in the decision of vote in favor of doctor JUAN MANUEL SANTOS; my present opinion is serious error the election of the Dr. Saints, I have after all this crossed way two hypotheses, both ominous for a professional with ethics and moral to all test. Which indicates that it mistakes to me to follow blindly without critical criterion as must be in situations like this. The first hypothesis is that the gentleman, says the truth in the case in the peace accords, that their businesses are behind the back of the town and betraying their voters in favor of obtaining their re-election and possible Nobel prize of peace; in such situation we waited for an important backward movement in the society, policy and economically we will have consequences, without unknown that the interlocutors obtained the privileges by which they fought during half century and they bathed of innocent blood the fields and cities of the country. All this without giving the minimum gesture of repentance however follows its arrogance in its speech. The second hypothesis is that this horseman is playing the strategy of the enemy; to show a public speech and to administer an hidden agenda, serious risk, the credibility of its negotiators gives to think that the steps direct a strange hand to them that at a distance handles the process, the lack of freedom to speak for a reason or purpose of commission or personnel of the negotiators of the government leaves doubts. It is certain that with this idea we could see the terrorists in the banks of the assemblies, councils and congress like easy military objective to give them of loss; who took and paid the high political and social cost. It would be an infinite chain of lies, treason and deceit.